The Case for Rand Paul for President in 2020

Though Rand Pauls bid for the Presidency in 2016 ended after the Iowa Caucuses, he has an opportunity to rebound in 2020. Rand Paul is the libertarian-conservative son of former Texas congressman Ron Paul who retains great appeal as an outsider candidate, the type of candidate that has been successful in Republican primaries in recent years. In his 2010 run for the US Senate, Pauls primary opponent was a hand-picked ally of US Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Though his name helped him become a US Senator, Rand Paul would have to prove himself in the years that would follow. By 2016, Paul had even managed to become a strong ally of Mitch McConnell, proving that outsiders and insiders can work together. Seizing on an Opening In the first two years of his political career, Paul was not viewed as a major player in the political world. Fellow rising stars Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida received most of the attention and press and played a larger role in Mitt Romneys presidential campaign. Christie was the early favorite of the more entrenched and moderate politicians and voters, while Rubio was well-liked by everyone, but a clear favorite of the Tea Party. And then something happened: Rand Paul filibustered a nominee to bring attention to the federal governments droning program. Pauls numbers shot up immediately, and he was now gaining an audience. His libertarian-leanings made him a natural spokesperson to promote abolishing the IRS during the tea party targeting scandal and as a privacy advocate during the NSA surveillance scandal. As the Obama administration agreed to intervene in worn-torn Syria - in which that intervention could possibly once again lead to arming terrorist-supporting forces - Pauls opposition was sound. In 2013, nearly every breaking story was starting to play perfectly into Pauls political realm as Rubios ill-advised enforcement-free immigration push led to a quick erosion of conservative support. A Libertarian-Conservative Platform A Rand Paul candidacy could possibly shake up the field like no other candidate outside of, say, Sarah Palin. Paul would likely be the most fierce advocate for federalism and limited government. His states right approach on issues ranging from gay marriage to marijuana legalization is one in which the grassroots of the Republican Party is rushing to following years of being let down by big government Republicanism. Paul would be less prone to agreeing to big government programs out of fear of being attacked by the media. He would also likely have the least interventionist foreign policy of all the candidates. Foreign policy is an area where the Republican party desperately needs to have an honest talk about the United States proper role. After 8 years of what is turning into one foreign policy disaster after the next, 2016 may be the perfect time to have that debate. Too often, Republicans seem too afraid to just say not to supporting interventionist policies. The debate is needed. While Paul leans very libertarian overall, he is not a socially-liberal libertarian. He is very pro-life and has stood up for life. If anyone can make the argument that you dont have to hold Christian beliefs to realize that a life is a life, Paul might be that guy. On Economic policy, he is good on taxes, subsidies, and opposing crony capitalism. He is a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment. He joined fellow tea party star Ted Cruz in opposing the Rubio immigration plan. Does Paul have flaws? Of course. But he is firmly entrenched on the liberty and freedom side of the GOP, perhaps more-so than any other potential candidate. Electability Which brings us to the most important question: is Rand Paul electable? While Paul became a viable US Senate candidate mostly because of who is father was, he is in many ways very different than his father. His father was never taken seriously by most observers. Whether it was his larger-than-reality personality or some of the positions he took (and the way he explained them), Ron Paul was just never a mainstream kind of candidate. Rand Paul is different on many levels. Paul is more measured in his approach. He is naturally gifted in debating points that most conservatives wouldnt touch. He knows how to pick his battles and knows how to not step into a trap. As a politician, Rand Paul is proving to be vastly superior to his father. His appeal can also be broad. He is now a grassroots conservative favorite, though he lost the battle of outsider to both Donald Trump and Ted Cruz in 2016. He has had some trouble convincing the more interventionist crowd on his foreign policy, and would need to work on that portion of his platform before launching another bid. His argument does have some appeal: We are tired of funding nations run by people who hate us; We are tired of arming rebels who wind up being more extreme than the people we wanted overthrown, and then get attacked with our own weapons. Obama ran on change in foreign policy and has been no less interventionist or check-write happy than any of his predecessors. Rand Paul needs to find the right balance on foreign policy that both adheres to his beliefs and exhibits strength and resolve when necessary. Then there is the youth factor. In 2012, Mitt Romney won with people over 30, but overwhelmingly lost the 29-and-under crowd. While Ron Paul did not have broad support, he did have a lot of support with younger people. Rand Paul has positioned himself against both the Obama Administration and entrenched Republicans like John McCain on the governments US citizen data-mining programs. Paul even threatened a class-action lawsuit with the American people over that surveillance. His libertarian and hands off view of government can actually appeal to the age brackets that overwhelmingly supported Obama, and who have gradually become disenchanted with the direction he has taken. Rand Pauls electability is enhanced because he might have the best chance of persuading the age bracket the GOP does worst with.

Understanding Humanity in Mark Twains Huck Finn - 597 Words

It is extremely important to understand humanity because it forces us to think critically about the challenges that face one as an individual as well as a society. Understanding of this allows us to blend into a society that is constantly improving itself. Without humanity, no civilization would ever advance at all; it would just stay in the same place. Humanity in Huckleberry Finn is the understanding that others are not sub-human creatures without souls or feelings. True humanity is far broader than one understanding though, as the definition varies from person to person. Humanity is being able to ignore the natural instinct of going along with the views of society and show the compassion and mercy to see one another as a human being. It is stopping unjust behavior to help others become more equal. Humanity is a blend of kindness, care, and a restoration of dignity. Twain’s Huckleberry Finn implies that one must leave â€Å"civilized† society in order to find oneâ₠¬â„¢s humanity. Even though Huck â€Å"lit out† from society, he still maintains the views that were held toward African Americans. Huck is essentially given the stereotype of what is seen in culture as the best and smartest: white upper-middle class kid who is smart and educated even with his attitude of not wanting to be civilized. Likewise, Tom Sawyer is also given the white boy stereotype being thought of as more educated and civilized, because he read books even though he did not fully understand what they meant. TwainShow MoreRelatedRacism In Huckleberry Finn Analysis1458 Words   |  6 PagesMark Twain, the author of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, grew up in the antebellum south where blacks were often viewed as nothing more than just ignorant, lazy, pieces of property with no feelings. As Mark Twain grew older, the perception of blacks as ignorant property with no feelings remained the same and even intensified to a certain extent. Surprisingly, around the time The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was written, Mark Twain opposed slavery and presumably cringed at the common notionRead MoreHuck Finn Essay768 Words   |  4 PagesHuck Finn Essay Question: Should the word â€Å"nigger† be censored and replaced with the word â€Å"slave† in the newly published editions of Huck Finn? Defend or Reject claim Ernest Hemingway once said, â€Å"all modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain, called Huckleberry Finn:† However, Huck Finn has had its share of controversy. There has been an ongoing debate to whether or not schools should continue to teach Huck Finn because of the obvious racial components and the constant use ofRead MoreThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Research Paper1649 Words   |  7 PagesSince its first publication in 1884, Mark Twain’s masterpiece The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has proven to be one of history’s most controversial novels; especially recently, the novel has often been banned by schools and censored by libraries. Characters in the book are constantly using disparaging language toward slaves, and the repeated use of the word â€Å"nigger† makes many sensitive and offended. Critics denounce the novel and Mark Twain as racist for this word being insulting and politicallyRead MoreThe American Concept Of Self Cr eation1647 Words   |  7 Pagesnew identity to avoid danger or ridding themselves of a past life, are two examples of the literary concept of Self-Creation. In Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, we see the main character undergo several examples of â€Å"self-creation† during the course of the story for various motivations including those mentioned above. Throughout Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the main character changes in identity for several reasons to include those in which he protects himself and slave Jim. The book’sRead More Critics of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Essay1446 Words   |  6 PagesCritics of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn   The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is considered by many to be the greatest American novel ever written.   Despite this praise, Mark Twain’s masterpiece has never been without criticism.   Upon its inception it was blasted for being indecent literature for young readers because of its lack of morals and contempt for conformity.   Modern indignation toward Huck Finn arises from its racist undertones, most notably Twain’s treatment of the character Jim.   AsRead MoreResearch Paper Mark Twain1306 Words   |  6 PagesIsabella Thomaz Donna Hunter - Period 2 Research Paper - Mark Twain October 26, 2012 MARK TWAIN: A REMARKABLE MAN WHO PAINTED THE WORLD â€Å"Classic - a book which people praise and dont read.† When Samuel L. Clemens (more often referred to as Mark Twain) said this, he meant it in a humorous sense, but he also wanted people to understand it’s meaning. People call books like Huck Finn and Gatsby classics, yet the idea that these books are actually read by everyone isn’t so. Twain isn’t justRead MoreShould the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Be Required in Shcool?983 Words   |  4 PagesAdventures of Huckleberry Finn be required in school? Mark Twain’s â€Å"The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn† is said to be one of the greatest American novels to ever be written and is what all other pieces of American literature are based off of. The novel has been debated for over an entire century and will continue to be debated for much longer. Never the less, Huckleberry Finn teaches young students and adults the important life lessons. †The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn† by Mark Twain should remainRead MoreMark Twain s The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn1752 Words   |  8 Pagesinto New England which were pro-slavery in the 1850s (Ingraham). In Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn the setting is somewhere around 1840 in the areas surrounding the Mississippi River, and there were different standards back then regarding race. Twain has his characters fit the mold of how someone back then would talk and how they would act, and racism is a part of that. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Fin n, Mark Twain uses realistic elements such as regionalist dialect and the characters’Read MoreThemes in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn which Transcend Boundaries of Time and Culture1291 Words   |  6 PagesMark Twain’s novel, â€Å"The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), commonly known as Huckleberry Finn or Huck Finn, colorfully depicts people and places along the great Mississippi River. the novel contains a collection of themes which transcend time and cultural boundaries. It tells of a poor white buy running from a brutal parent, and an African-American man attempting to escape and free his himself from slavery. The main character, Huckleberry Finn, spends much time in the novel floating down theRead MoreEssay about The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Should NOT Be Banned2973 Words   |  12 Pagesbooks around the world have been banned because they are offensive. One example is Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, a novel about the journey of a thirteen-year-old boy named Huck, who fabricates his own death to run away with an escaped slave named Jim. The two voyage in a raft along the Mississippi River to gain their individual freedom. In addition, Huck gains a new understanding about humanity. Huck Finn has been creating great controversy on both sides of the argument: to ban or to

Financial Accounting Point Regarding Financial Crisis

Question: Describe about the Financial Accounting for Point Regarding Financial Crisis. Answer: Ethical Dilemma The ethical dilemma analyzed in the case study is that company has faced some volatility because of some current financial crisis and in the first meeting the agenda do not contain any point regarding that financial crisis (Ferrell Fraedrich,2015). Being a member of the Audit Committee, it is his responsibility; there should be proper disclosure of risk of a factor in the financial statement of the company. Being a member of the audit committee of the company, he also analyzed that in the future company can also have some promising debts. In addition to it, it also does not have scheduled quarterly compliance audit on the portfolio loan, which is very much necessary for the lenders as a performance reporting. Then further moving on to the case study, the matter has been reported and been asked for the explanation to the chairman of the audit committee for not including the issue in the report (Zadek et al., 2013). But the chairman of the committee says that the matters have been already discussed with the CEO, and he has advised for not raising the matter of the financial crises in the meeting which is to be held and not to disclose the matter to any other, specially to the lenders of the committee. Further to that CEO has also said that the company will not be signing the compliance of the loan audit. It is so, as the audit is at the request of debt provider and not the committee. Still, after getting explanations, the person from the audit committee is concerned that the providers of the debt will be assuming the lo an compliance are being taken into considerations by the audit committee. Then the statement is prepared according to that because it is known that the leaders of the company are dependent on the favorability of the audit compliance (Doherty Purtilo,2015). Major ethical dilemma involved in the Case study is, not the inclusion of the loan compliance by the audit committee. Audit committee is the one, on whom every is relying for the correct disclosure of the facts and figure of the company. The Audit people is very much responsible for the proper disclosure of the financial statement so they should properly analyze all the aspects and facts of the financial reporting and present the report true to the fact. Disclosure of the financial statement should be done truly because it is the only method for an investor for analyzing a company for investing. The inclusion of the debt portfolio and loan in the company will be depicting limitation in company's position, which may tell the lenders and the investor to the withdrawal of the investment from the company. The company having a large number of debts and loans depicts that company cannot give much return to the investors of the company shortly (Kuntz et al., 2013). The CEO is advising not t o show the loan and debt portfolio by the auditing committee so that the investor can remain in the business for the longer period. But the ethical point should also be considered in disclosing the statements. Due to the ethical dilemma in the organization, many other issues may arise. The ethical dilemma will also create many conflicting problems in the mind of the members of the company. The ethical dilemma creates conflicts in the mind of the people working in the organization. Ethical dilemma ignores the fact of the morality. Ethical points dilemma creates a point of value and morality in the organization. Ethical dilemma stops a member of the company in fulfilling his or her responsibilities and duties true to the fact with all the presence of all the morality in the act. Reference list Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. (2015).Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Zadek, S., Evans, R., Pruzan, P. (2013).Building corporate accountability: Emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Routledge. Doherty, R. F., Purtilo, R. B. (2015).Ethical dimensions in the health professions. Elsevier Health Sciences. Kuntz, J. R. C., Kuntz, J. R., Elenkov, D., Nabirukhina, A. (2013). Characterizing ethical cases: A cross-cultural investigation of individual differences, organisational climate, and leadership on ethical decision-making.Journal of Business Ethics,113(2), 317-331.

Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Example Essay Example

Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Example Paper Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Introduction One of Luke’s main interests in Jesus was his preaching on the Kingdom of God. As Luke was arguably a gentile, he wanted to prove to all people that the Kingdom was present and that everyone is welcome to become a member. However what Luke wrote about the kingdom in some areas did contradict the Jews expectations. For example, Jewish understanding of the kingdom was that a divine rule would be the counterpart of the earthly kingship. This goes back to Old Testament when the prophet Samuel first anointed the first Jewish King Saul, as so was King David. The anointing of a king meant that they would represent God’s rule and would be regarded as God-sent.Jewish understanding of the kingdom increased significantly after Israel lost her independence in C6 BCE. Concepts of King and Messiah emerged during the inter-testamental era. The heavenly hosts of angels would defeat the devil and his armies and heaven would literally be created on earth. Essenes took particular interest in this belief as they searched for liberation and the coming of the kingdom of God. Another concept consists of no war. However gentiles would realise that there is no other saviour than Israel’s God, and would thus worship ‘God’ and acquiesce to the Jews.Jesus’ concept however of the Kingdom differed to that of the Jews as to them, the Kingdom of God would be much more earthly. As in Mark 1:15, ‘the Kingdom of God has arrived’. Jesus thus believed the kingdom to be a present reality in himself and his ministry ‘the kingdom of God is within you’ (Luke 17:21). However there have been three suggestions about the real meaning of eschatology. Futurist eschatology embrace Jesus’ teachings as a meaning that God’s kingdom will come in a tangible form at a time that is still in the future. This can be rectified as the ‘parousia’. According to Albert Schweitzer, who first popularised this idea meant however, th at Jesus held the same expectations as many Jewish apocalyptic writers of his day. He suggested that Jesus believed God would intervene immediately in the affairs of humanity and that his own life’s work would be the divisive climax that would come within Jesus’ lifetime.However C.H. Dodd contradicted Schweitzer’s theory on ‘futurist eschatology’and introduced his theory on ‘realised eschatology’. According to Dodd what Jesus was really saying was that the new society had arrived in his own person through his teachings thus Jesus’ teaching is ‘inaugural eschatology’. The coming of Jesus is thus the coming of God’s eternal reign.Miracles are much easier to understand if they are regarded as signs that God was creating a new society right there and then. To put these miracles into context, according to 1st century Jewish thinking, if one was ill, it was either due to their parents sins, or their own. However whe n Jesus healed the sick, for example the lame man, Jesus himself said, ‘friend your sins are forgiven.pick up your mat and walk’. This healing shows scholars today that to heal a person, was to forgive them, thus bring them back to God.Parables that appear to be concerned with the last days, such as the 10 bridesmaids or the rich fool, may not be a clear explanation of the final days however the challenge that all people when they are confronted with the message about Jesus and God’s new society. Dodd argues that the parable of the Great banquet does not in fact suggest that those who didn’t turn up to the banquet would not get a place in heaven however he states that those who didn’t turn up to the banquet, in fact turned up late and thus be given a second chance. This does seem to agree with his theory on realised eschatology, in that the kingdom is present and that everyone is given another opportunity.A third theory of eschatology is called â₠¬Ëœinaugurated eschatology’. This recognises that God’s new society did actually come in Jesus however the complete fulfilment was still seen in the future. This theory takes the best of both futurist and realised eschatology. This view recognises that God’s new society came in Jesus hence his teaching is ‘inaugurated’. This theory also recognises Schweitzer’s theory on futurist eschatology as it considers Jesus’ background as a first century Jew thus his teaching includes future events such as the downfall of the Temple, and the resurrection as part of the consummation of God’s society.What did Jesus mean about the Kingdom of God? The kingdom is defined as the ‘state or territory ruled by a king. In this case, as Luke suggests, God was going to set up a new state and rule it himself, however rather than being a material state, such as Israel, as it was in the Old Testament, it would be spiritual state for all mankind.When Jesus spoke about the Kingdom he mentioned in the Lords prayer ‘Father.Thy kingdom come’. Jesus uses the word Abba as if talking to an earthly father. This becomes much more personal and develops a much more loving relationship in comparison to that of the Old Testament, where all Jews feared a ‘jealous’ God. The word Abba indicates the uniqueness of the relationship between Jesus and his Father.Jesus saw the Kingdom of God as a New Israel, just as all first century Jews of his believed. Jesus taught that God’s rule requires realm in which to work. He speaks of men entering or being ‘cast out’ of the kingdom. Parables such as the mustard seed with its reference to birds nestling in its branches shows that Jesus has the gathering of a whole society in mind, or it could be described that if anyone has a small amount of faith, it will grow and influence others, just as the disciples preached and converted many to Christianity and those who died in Jesus’ name also influence others and strengthened their faith. Jesus also speaks of himself as a shepherd gathering his flock. In order to put his beliefs into practice however, Jesus had to ordain others to carry the Kerygma far and wide after his death and resurrection as prophesied in Luke 24:47-48, ‘.repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations.you are witnesses of these things.I am going to send you what God has promised’.Jesus called the twelve disciples, in parallel to the twelve tribes of Israel. This symbolic meaning could be translated into the fact that Jesus wanted his Holy word to be spread round the whole world beginning in Jerusalem, as mentioned in Luke 24:26. This would be beginning of the creation of the New Israel. The disciples were sent out to proclaim the Kingdom (Luke9:1-2) ‘He gave them power to drive out all demons and to cure diseases.sent them out to preach the kingdom of God’.In the Last Supper, Jesus himself shared the New Covenant; ‘I will not eat and drink from this cup until it finds fulfilment of in the kingdom of God.’ The significance of the Last Supper in context of the kingdom, is that in the Old Testament Moses made a covenant with God using bull’s blood, however it was not eternal as it had been broken several times by the Israelites, however Jesus died on the cross to bridge an ‘eternal’ relationship with God, for all people.In Luke’s gospel, the kingdom is centred in Christ, (Luke 18:29) ‘for the sake of the kingdom of God’. Mark writes, ‘the Kingdom of God came with power’. The gospel writers all assumed the same meaning between the kingdom of God and Christ. Jews believed that the ‘Christ’ would rather lead an earthly kingdom following the Torah laws, however they didn’t expect a heavenly spiritual Christ. What Jesus says, was originally taken from Daniel 7: ‘.Son of Man.and he was given dominion and a kingdom that all peoples and nations would serve him.the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever.’This means that God gives the kingdom to the Son of Man and the Saints of the Most High will also receive it. This could explain why in Luke’s gospel, Jesus promises the kingdom to those who believe in His name (Luke 9:24) ‘for whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it.’ However in order to fulfil his destiny Jesus had to suffer, die and rise again on the third day, therefore fulfilling the scriptures and Isaiah’s suffering servant prayer.Jews believed that in order to inherit the Kingdom of heaven you had to be a Jew and follow the law, which God gave to them. However in Luke’s gospel, Jesus tells his disciples and followers, to ‘carry his cross and follow him’. In order to inherit the kingd om, just as Jesus suffered and died for our sins, to be a disciple, you must not carry material possessions but put others before yourself. Jewish teaching on an ‘eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ had now changed to forgiving others and ‘treat others as yourself’.The consummation of the kingdom however is still yet to come. Despite Jesus’ prophecies that he will die and rise on the third day, Jesus also prophesied of a ‘second coming’ as mentioned earlier, the ‘parousia’. Mark 13:26, ‘and they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds.before him will be gathered all the nations and he will separate them from one another as a shepherd separates the sheep from goats.’ Schweitzer believed that Jesus’ death was in vain and did not fulfil its purpose, however Dodd has argued that Jesus fulfilled Old Testament scriptures and is still yet to complete the coming of Judgement day. It has been argued that the fire of Rome was arguably the beginning of the end as all Christians were persecuted, (Luke21:12) ‘.but before all this they must first lay hands on you and persecute you’. The destruction of the Temple was also predicted, thus many people perceived the end of days were near. In Paul’s writings, he writes with a sense of urgency and says ‘do not marry, or sin for the end of days are near, be ready!’ However many Christians today believe that the end of days are still to come, which both Jews and Christians alike await.In conclusion, Jewish understanding of the Kingdom of God slightly differs to that of Jesus’ teachings. Jews expected an earthly king to come and liberate them from the occupation of the Romans, as Jesus entered Jerusalem, they expected him to ride on a horse with armament as a ‘fighting’ leader, on the contrary Jesus was humble and instead rode on a donkey. In Luke’s gospel as well as the other gospel writers , the Kingdom is portrayed as a spiritual kingdom for all people united as one. Jewish leaders of the day took this teaching as an insult to the Jewish nation as they had been waiting centuries to be set free and yet they didn’t get their earthly response. However one agreement between Christians and Jews alike, is that they still await the Judgement Day in earnest and the coming of Christ in order to consummate the kingdom. Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Thank you for reading this Sample!