Tuesday, January 21, 2020

The Gates Essay examples -- essays research papers

The long awaited project phenomenon that is due to make art history, The Gates, by Christo and Jeanne-Claude. Given permission by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on January 22, 2003, the project is set to be mounted in Central Park in New York City February 12th of this year. The planned project is to resemble a golden river. Thus consisted to 7500 gates in total standing 16 feet (4.87 meters) high with a width changing from 5' 6" to 18 feet (1,67 m to 5,48 meters) going along the edges of the Central Park pathways. Saffron colored fabric panels suspended from the horizontal top part of the gates will come down to approximately 7 feet ( 2,13 meters) above the ground. Each gate will be spaced at 12 foot (3,65 meter) from each other, but might vary where trees expand above the walkways allowing the synthetic woven panels to wave towards the next gate and be seen from far away through the leafless branches of the trees. The construction itself is a big development in itself. There are to be hundreds of residents to help in the project for temporary employment doing the following things: Manufacturing and assembling of the gates structures, Installation workers, Maintenance teams around the clock, in uniform and with radios, Removal workers. The work is consisted of a lot of materials that, in the end, will be recycled at an assembly plant in Queens,NY. The materials are as follows: †¢ 5,290 US Tons of steel (4,799 Metric Tons) (10,580,000 pounds) (equal to 2/3 the ste...

Monday, January 13, 2020

Night World : Black Dawn Chapter 6

Because there's no point. She's as good as dead already.† Jeanne's expression was as hard andclosedas it had been in the beginning. â€Å"But – â€Å" â€Å"Can't you see? She'd slow us down. There's noway she could run without help. And besides that,P.J. says she's blind.† Blind. A new little shock went though Maggie.What would that be like, to be in this situation andsick and blind on top of it? She tugged on the girl's shoulder gently, tryingto see the averted face. But she's beautiful. The girl had smooth skin the color of coffee with cream, delicate features, high cheekbones, perfectlips. Her black hair was pulled into a loose, glossyknot on her neck. Her eyes were shut, long eye lashes tremblingas if she were dreaming. It was more than just the physical features,though. There was a serenity about this girl's face,a gentleness and stillness that was †¦ unique. â€Å"Hey, there,† Maggie said softly. â€Å"Can you hearme? I'm Maggie. What's your name?† The girl's eyelashes fluttered; her lips parted. ToMaggie's surprise, she murmured something. Maggie had to lean down close to catch it. â€Å"Arcadia?† she repeated. It was a strange name; she wasn't sure she'd heard right. The girl seemed to nod, murmuring again. She can hear me, Maggie thought. She canrespond. â€Å"Okay. Can I call you Cady? Listen to me, Cady.†Maggie shook the girl's shoulder slightly. â€Å"We're ina bad place but we're going to try to escape. If we help you out, do you think you can run?† Again, the eyelashes fluttered. Then the eyesopened. Doe eyes, Maggie thought, startled. They wereextraordinarily large and clear, a warm brown withan inner radiance. And they might be blind, butMaggie had the oddest sensation that she had justbeen seen more clearly than ever before in her life. â€Å"I'll try,† Cady murmured. She sounded dazedand in pain, but quietly rational. â€Å"Sometimes I feelstrong for a little while.† She pushed herself up. Maggie had to help her get into a sitting position. She's tall. But she's pretty light†¦and I've gotgood muscles. I can support her. â€Å"What are you doing?†Jeanne said in a voice thatwas not just harsh and impatient but horrified. â€Å"Don't you see? You're only making it worse. You should just have let her sleep.† Maggie glanced up. â€Å"Look. I don't know whatyou're thinking, but we can't leave anybody with them. How would you like to be left behind if itwas you?† Jeanne's face changed. For a moment, she lookedmore like a savage animal than a girl. â€Å"I'd understand,† she snarled. â€Å"Because that's the way it has to be. It's the law of the jungle, here. Only strongpeople survive. The weak ones †¦ .†She shook her head. â€Å"They're better off dead. And the faster youlearn that, the more chance you'll have.† Maggie felt a spurt of horror and anger-and,fear. Because Jeanne clearly knew the most about this place, and Jeanne might be right. They mightall get caught because of one weak person who wouldn't make it anyway†¦. She turned and looked at the lovely face again.Arcadia was Miles's age, eighteen or nineteen. And although she seemed to hear what Jeanne was say ing-she'd turned her face that way-she didn'tspeak or argue. She didn't lose her still gentleness, either. I can't leave her. What if Miles is alive but hurtsomewhere, and somebody won't help him? Maggie shot a glance at P.J. in her baseball cap.She was young-she might be able to take care ofherself, but that was all. â€Å"Look, this isn't your problem,† she finally saidto Jeanne. â€Å"You just help P.J. get away safe, okay?You take care of her, and III be responsible for Cady.† â€Å"You'll be caught with Cady,† Jeanne said flatly.†Don't worry about it.† â€Å"I'm not. And I'm telling you right now; I'm notgoing to help you if you get in trouble.† â€Å"I don't want you to,† Maggie said. She lookedright into Jeanne's angry eyes. â€Å"Really. I don't wantto wreck your chances, okay? But I'm not going toleave her.† Jeanne looked furious for another moment; thenshe shrugged. All the emotion drained from herface as if she were deliberately distancing herself.The bond she and Maggie had shared for that brief moment was severed. She turned, looked through a crack behind her,then turned back. â€Å"Fine,† she said in a dull, indifferent tone. â€Å"Whatever you're going to do, you'd better get ready todo it now. Because the place is coming right up.† â€Å"Ready?† Maggie said. They were all standing-or crouching, actually,since there wasn't room to straighten up-withtheir backs against the walls of the cart. Jeanneand P.J. on one side, Maggie on the other, with Cady in the corner. â€Å"When I say go, you guys jump over here. Thenall of us throw ourselves back that way,† Maggie whispered. Jeanne was peering out of the crack. â€Å"Okay, thisis it,† she said. â€Å"Now.† Maggie said,†Go!† She had been a little worried that P.J. would freeze. But the moment the word was out of Maggie's mouth, Jeanne launched herself across thecart, crashing heavily into her, and P.J. followed. ThecartrockedsurprisinglyhardandMaggieheard the groan of wood. â€Å"Back!† she yelled, and everybody lunged the other way. Maggie hit a solid wall and knew shewould have bruises, but the cart rocked again. â€Å"Come on!† she yelled, and realized that they were all already coming on, throwing themselvesto the other side in perfect sync. It was as if someflocking instinct had taken over and they were all three moving as one, throwing their weight alter nately back and forth. And the cart was responding, grinding to a halt and lurching off balance. It was like one of thoseparty tricks where five or six people each use only two fingers to lift someone on a chair. Their combined force was impressive. But not enough to tip the cart over. It was surprisingly well-balanced. And at any minute, Maggie realized, the people driving it were going to jumpout and put a stop to it. â€Å"Everybody-come on! Really hard! Really hard!†She was yelling as if she were encouraging her soccer team. â€Å"We've got to do it, now.† She launched herself at the other side as the cartbegan to sway that way, jumping as highas shecould, hitting the wallas it reached the farthestpoint of its rock. She could feel the other girlsflinging themselves with her, she could hear Jeanne giving a primal yell as she crashed into the wood. And then there was a splintering sound, amazingly loud, amazingly long. A sort of groaning and shrieking that came from the wood itself, and aneven louder scream of panic that Maggie realizedmust have come from the horses. The whole world was,Run, Maggie thought. Stop looking now. Run. She ran into the forest, dragging Cady with her. They had to find a place to hide – underbrush or something. Maybe they could climb a tree†¦. But one look at Cady and she realized how stupid thatidea was. The smooth skin of the girl's facewas clammy and luminous with sweat, her eyeswere half shut, and her chest was heaving. At least Jeanne and P.J. got away, Maggiethought. Just then there was a crashing behind her, and a voice cursing. Maggie threw another glance backand found herself staring at a man's figure in the mist. A scary man. The mist swirling behind him madehim look eerie, supernatural, but it was more thanthat. He was huge,with shouldersasbroad as a two-by-four, a massive chest, and heavily muscledarms. His waist was surprisingly narrow. His face was cruel. â€Å"Gavin! I've got two of them!† he shouted.Maggie didn't wait to hear more. She took offlike a black-tailed deer. And for a long time after that it was just a nightmare of running and being chased, stopping sometimes when she couldn't hold Cady up anymore, looking for places to hide. At one point, she andCady were pressed together inside a hollow tree,trying desperately to get their breath back withoutmaking a sound, when their pursuers passed right by them. Maggie heard the crunch and squish offootsteps on ferns and started praying. She couldfeel Cady's heart beating hard, shaking them both, she realized that Cady's lips were moving soundlessly. Maybe she's praying, too, Maggie thought,t, andapplied her eye to a crack in the tree. There were two people there, horribly close, justa few feet away. One was the man she'd seen before he was doing something bizarre, somethingthat sent chills up her spine. He was turning his face this way and that with his eyes shut, his head twisting on a surprisingly long and supple neck. As if he's smellingus out, Maggie thought, horrified. Eyes still shut, the man said, â€Å"Do you sense anything?† â€Å"No. I can't feel them at all. And I can't see them,with these trees for cover.† It was a younger manwho spoke, a boy really. He must be Gavin, Maggiethought. Gavin had dark blond hair, a thin nose, a sharp chin. His voice was impatient. â€Å"I can't feel them either,† the big man said flatly,refusing to be hurried. â€Å"And that's strange. Theycan't have gotten too far away. They must beblocking us.† â€Å"I don't care what they're doing,† Gavin said.†We'd better get them back fast. It's not like theywere ordinary slaves. If we don tdeliver that maiden we're dead. You're dead, Bern.† Maiden? Maggie thought. I guess in a placewhere they have slaves it's not weird to talk aboutmaidens. But which girl does he mean? Not me;I'm not important. â€Å"We'll get her back,† Bern was saying. â€Å"We'd better,† Gavin said viciously. â€Å"Or I'm goingto tell her that it was your fault. We were supposedto make sure this didn't happen.† â€Å"It hasn't happened yet,† Bern said. He turned onhis heel and walked into the mist. Gavin staredafter him for a moment, and then followed. Maggie let out her breath. She realized that Cady's lips had stopped moving. â€Å"Let's go,† she whispered, and took off in the opposite direction to the one the men had gone. Then there was a time of endless running andpausing and listening and hiding. The forest was aterrible place. Around them was eerie twilight,made even spookier by the mist that lay in hollowsand crept over fallen trees. Maggie felt as if she were in some awful fairy tale. The only good thingwas that the dampness softened their footsteps,making it hard to track them. But it was so quiet. No ravens, no gray jays. No deer. Just the mist and the trees, going on forever.And then it ended. Maggie and Cady suddenly burst out into an-.other meadow. Maggie gavea frantic glancearound, looking for shelter. Nothing. The mist was thinner here, she could see that there were no trees ahead, only an outcrop of rocks. Maybe we should double back†¦. But the voices were shouting in the forest behind them. Above the rocks was a barren ledge. It lookedlike the end of a path, winding the other way down the mountain. If we could get there, we'd be safe, Maggiethought. We could be around the corner in a minute, and out of sight. Dragging Cady, she headed for the rocks. Theydidn't belong here; they were huge granite boulders deposited by some ancient glacier. Maggie clambered up the side of one easily, then leaned down. â€Å"Give me your hand,† she said rapidly. â€Å"There sa path up above us, but we've got to climb a little.† Cady looked at her. Or-not looked, Maggie supposed. But she turned her face toward Maggie, and once again Maggie had the odd feeling that those blind eyescould somehow see better than most people's. â€Å"You should leave me,† Cady said. â€Å"Don't be stupid,† Maggie said. â€Å"Hurry up, giveme your hand.† Cady shook her head. â€Å"You go,† she said quietly.She seemed completely rational-and absolutely exhausted. She hadn't lost the tranquility whichhad infused her from the beginning, but now itseemed mixed with a gentle resignation. Her fineboned face was drawn with weariness. â€Å"I`ll justslow you down. And if I stay here, you'll have moretime to get away.† â€Å"I'm not going to leave you!† Maggie snapped.†Come on!† Arcadia remained for just a second, her faceturned up to Maggie's, then her clear and luminousbrown eyes filled. Her expression was one of inexpressible tenderness. Then she shook her headslightly and grabbed Maggie's hand-very accurately. Maggie didn't waste. time. She climbed as fastasshe could, pulling Cady, rapping out breathless instructions. But the delay had cost them. She could hear the men getting nearer. And when she reached the far end of the pile ofboulders she saw something that sent shock waves through her system. She was looking up a barren cliff face. There wasno connection from the rocks to the ledge above.And below her, the hillside dropped off steeply, ahundred feet down into a gorge. She'd led Cady right into a trap. There was nowhere else to go.

Sunday, January 5, 2020

Harry Potter and The Astrology Signs - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 756 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/04/12 Category Literature Essay Level High school Topics: Harry Potter Essay Did you like this example? Harry Potter: Leo Leos are the center of attention so it makes sense that the main character would be a Leo. While Leos usually have a pompous air, they arent egomaniacs. They are natural born leaders, and people look to you to show them the way. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Harry Potter and The Astrology Signs" essay for you Create order The book makes it clear that Harry is the leader of the group. The plus side of being these qualities are that you attract loyal friends, who youll do anything to protect. Ron and Hermione are some of the most loyal friends, and for Harry to get not only one but two best mates, that would follow him on any adventure, he must have a presence that makes people want to follow him. The downside is that it seems like everything is always happening to you. Luckily, theyve got the strength of character to weather any storm (but seriously, you wouldnt mind taking a break from the spotlight once in a while). A personality trait that most Leos have is that they embrace being the center of attention. Harry doesnt love the spotlight, it just kind of finds him. Birthday July 31 Leo Most of the personality traits of a Leo fit Harry perfectly. With everything from his leadership ability and loyalty, to his need to be in charge and sometimes off-putting dominance, Harry Potter is a natural born Leo. Ron Weasley: Taurus Tauruss are dependable (or as some might put it, stubborn), and you make great friends. They like comforts to enjoy the comforts of life and you wouldnt turn down a little extra cash so some people mistake them for shallow. Ron is a very loyal friend and has definitely been called stubborn once or twice throughout the book. He is also well known to eat a hearty meal. Ron didnt come from a wealthy family so he is very likely to enjoy a couple extra galleons when given, but hes not shallow at all: his emotions run deep, far deeper than anyone around him knows. Even though his stubbornness counters it sometimes, he still knows how to have fun. Birthday March 1 Pisces Those born under the zodiac sign Pisces are daydreamers their mind leans towards the fantastical and mystical. They are brooding by nature, and this can lead others to find them either intriguing and mysterious or other times boring or too quiet.. They care deeply for others, and Pisces can barely stand to see their loved ones unhappy. Ron does exhibit some of these qualities, such as brooding, or caring for others (even if he does have the emotional range of a teaspoon). But he isnt exactly a daydreamer or do people find him intriguing, as he says many times during the book that he is overlooked because his best friend is the boy-who-lived. So while he does have lots of qualities of Pisces I find that he is better fitting as a Taurus. Hermione Granger: Virgo August 23 September 22 A Virgo is someone who is altruistic, logical, responsible, and organized. Hermione is all of these things. In the first book, she makes many comments about how she already studied the curriculum and she stresses to the boys the importance of not breaking rules. People born under the astrology sign Virgo also have downfalls, they can be obsessive, critical, and perfectionists. Hermione exerts all of these quirks. She often talks down to Harry and Ron, even if she doesnt know shes doing it. She is also at the top of her class because she takes her grades so seriously. Birthday September 19 Virgo This means that she was born under the astrological sign that I thought she would. Hermione is almost the perfect example of a Virgo when you compare traits. Throughout the series, the author, J.K. Rowling, bases a multitude of things off of the stars. Among these are names (Sirius-the Dog, Regulus, Orion, ) She makes it a point to give her character the qualities to match that of their zodiac sign and even made it a class in the later books. It is clear that she believes in more magic than that of the kind she writes about. I would Also like to say that I am a Leo. I dont have many qualities of the Leo other than loyal to friends so this shows that our zodiac sign is not always a great estimate of character, but it is fun to compare your friends personalities to the one the sky seems to believe that they have.

Friday, December 27, 2019

The Case for Rand Paul for President in 2020

Though Rand Pauls bid for the Presidency in 2016 ended after the Iowa Caucuses, he has an opportunity to rebound in 2020. Rand Paul is the libertarian-conservative son of former Texas congressman Ron Paul who retains great appeal as an outsider candidate, the type of candidate that has been successful in Republican primaries in recent years. In his 2010 run for the US Senate, Pauls primary opponent was a hand-picked ally of US Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Though his name helped him become a US Senator, Rand Paul would have to prove himself in the years that would follow. By 2016, Paul had even managed to become a strong ally of Mitch McConnell, proving that outsiders and insiders can work together. Seizing on an Opening In the first two years of his political career, Paul was not viewed as a major player in the political world. Fellow rising stars Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida received most of the attention and press and played a larger role in Mitt Romneys presidential campaign. Christie was the early favorite of the more entrenched and moderate politicians and voters, while Rubio was well-liked by everyone, but a clear favorite of the Tea Party. And then something happened: Rand Paul filibustered a nominee to bring attention to the federal governments droning program. Pauls numbers shot up immediately, and he was now gaining an audience. His libertarian-leanings made him a natural spokesperson to promote abolishing the IRS during the tea party targeting scandal and as a privacy advocate during the NSA surveillance scandal. As the Obama administration agreed to intervene in worn-torn Syria - in which that intervention could possibly once again lead to arming terrorist-supporting forces - Pauls opposition was sound. In 2013, nearly every breaking story was starting to play perfectly into Pauls political realm as Rubios ill-advised enforcement-free immigration push led to a quick erosion of conservative support. A Libertarian-Conservative Platform A Rand Paul candidacy could possibly shake up the field like no other candidate outside of, say, Sarah Palin. Paul would likely be the most fierce advocate for federalism and limited government. His states right approach on issues ranging from gay marriage to marijuana legalization is one in which the grassroots of the Republican Party is rushing to following years of being let down by big government Republicanism. Paul would be less prone to agreeing to big government programs out of fear of being attacked by the media. He would also likely have the least interventionist foreign policy of all the candidates. Foreign policy is an area where the Republican party desperately needs to have an honest talk about the United States proper role. After 8 years of what is turning into one foreign policy disaster after the next, 2016 may be the perfect time to have that debate. Too often, Republicans seem too afraid to just say not to supporting interventionist policies. The debate is needed. While Paul leans very libertarian overall, he is not a socially-liberal libertarian. He is very pro-life and has stood up for life. If anyone can make the argument that you dont have to hold Christian beliefs to realize that a life is a life, Paul might be that guy. On Economic policy, he is good on taxes, subsidies, and opposing crony capitalism. He is a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment. He joined fellow tea party star Ted Cruz in opposing the Rubio immigration plan. Does Paul have flaws? Of course. But he is firmly entrenched on the liberty and freedom side of the GOP, perhaps more-so than any other potential candidate. Electability Which brings us to the most important question: is Rand Paul electable? While Paul became a viable US Senate candidate mostly because of who is father was, he is in many ways very different than his father. His father was never taken seriously by most observers. Whether it was his larger-than-reality personality or some of the positions he took (and the way he explained them), Ron Paul was just never a mainstream kind of candidate. Rand Paul is different on many levels. Paul is more measured in his approach. He is naturally gifted in debating points that most conservatives wouldnt touch. He knows how to pick his battles and knows how to not step into a trap. As a politician, Rand Paul is proving to be vastly superior to his father. His appeal can also be broad. He is now a grassroots conservative favorite, though he lost the battle of outsider to both Donald Trump and Ted Cruz in 2016. He has had some trouble convincing the more interventionist crowd on his foreign policy, and would need to work on that portion of his platform before launching another bid. His argument does have some appeal: We are tired of funding nations run by people who hate us; We are tired of arming rebels who wind up being more extreme than the people we wanted overthrown, and then get attacked with our own weapons. Obama ran on change in foreign policy and has been no less interventionist or check-write happy than any of his predecessors. Rand Paul needs to find the right balance on foreign policy that both adheres to his beliefs and exhibits strength and resolve when necessary. Then there is the youth factor. In 2012, Mitt Romney won with people over 30, but overwhelmingly lost the 29-and-under crowd. While Ron Paul did not have broad support, he did have a lot of support with younger people. Rand Paul has positioned himself against both the Obama Administration and entrenched Republicans like John McCain on the governments US citizen data-mining programs. Paul even threatened a class-action lawsuit with the American people over that surveillance. His libertarian and hands off view of government can actually appeal to the age brackets that overwhelmingly supported Obama, and who have gradually become disenchanted with the direction he has taken. Rand Pauls electability is enhanced because he might have the best chance of persuading the age bracket the GOP does worst with.

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Understanding Humanity in Mark Twains Huck Finn - 597 Words

It is extremely important to understand humanity because it forces us to think critically about the challenges that face one as an individual as well as a society. Understanding of this allows us to blend into a society that is constantly improving itself. Without humanity, no civilization would ever advance at all; it would just stay in the same place. Humanity in Huckleberry Finn is the understanding that others are not sub-human creatures without souls or feelings. True humanity is far broader than one understanding though, as the definition varies from person to person. Humanity is being able to ignore the natural instinct of going along with the views of society and show the compassion and mercy to see one another as a human being. It is stopping unjust behavior to help others become more equal. Humanity is a blend of kindness, care, and a restoration of dignity. Twain’s Huckleberry Finn implies that one must leave â€Å"civilized† society in order to find oneâ₠¬â„¢s humanity. Even though Huck â€Å"lit out† from society, he still maintains the views that were held toward African Americans. Huck is essentially given the stereotype of what is seen in culture as the best and smartest: white upper-middle class kid who is smart and educated even with his attitude of not wanting to be civilized. Likewise, Tom Sawyer is also given the white boy stereotype being thought of as more educated and civilized, because he read books even though he did not fully understand what they meant. TwainShow MoreRelatedRacism In Huckleberry Finn Analysis1458 Words   |  6 PagesMark Twain, the author of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, grew up in the antebellum south where blacks were often viewed as nothing more than just ignorant, lazy, pieces of property with no feelings. As Mark Twain grew older, the perception of blacks as ignorant property with no feelings remained the same and even intensified to a certain extent. Surprisingly, around the time The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was written, Mark Twain opposed slavery and presumably cringed at the common notionRead MoreHuck Finn Essay768 Words   |  4 PagesHuck Finn Essay Question: Should the word â€Å"nigger† be censored and replaced with the word â€Å"slave† in the newly published editions of Huck Finn? Defend or Reject claim Ernest Hemingway once said, â€Å"all modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain, called Huckleberry Finn:† However, Huck Finn has had its share of controversy. There has been an ongoing debate to whether or not schools should continue to teach Huck Finn because of the obvious racial components and the constant use ofRead MoreThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Research Paper1649 Words   |  7 PagesSince its first publication in 1884, Mark Twain’s masterpiece The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has proven to be one of history’s most controversial novels; especially recently, the novel has often been banned by schools and censored by libraries. Characters in the book are constantly using disparaging language toward slaves, and the repeated use of the word â€Å"nigger† makes many sensitive and offended. Critics denounce the novel and Mark Twain as racist for this word being insulting and politicallyRead MoreThe American Concept Of Self Cr eation1647 Words   |  7 Pagesnew identity to avoid danger or ridding themselves of a past life, are two examples of the literary concept of Self-Creation. In Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, we see the main character undergo several examples of â€Å"self-creation† during the course of the story for various motivations including those mentioned above. Throughout Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the main character changes in identity for several reasons to include those in which he protects himself and slave Jim. The book’sRead More Critics of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Essay1446 Words   |  6 PagesCritics of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn   The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is considered by many to be the greatest American novel ever written.   Despite this praise, Mark Twain’s masterpiece has never been without criticism.   Upon its inception it was blasted for being indecent literature for young readers because of its lack of morals and contempt for conformity.   Modern indignation toward Huck Finn arises from its racist undertones, most notably Twain’s treatment of the character Jim.   AsRead MoreResearch Paper Mark Twain1306 Words   |  6 PagesIsabella Thomaz Donna Hunter - Period 2 Research Paper - Mark Twain October 26, 2012 MARK TWAIN: A REMARKABLE MAN WHO PAINTED THE WORLD â€Å"Classic - a book which people praise and dont read.† When Samuel L. Clemens (more often referred to as Mark Twain) said this, he meant it in a humorous sense, but he also wanted people to understand it’s meaning. People call books like Huck Finn and Gatsby classics, yet the idea that these books are actually read by everyone isn’t so. Twain isn’t justRead MoreShould the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Be Required in Shcool?983 Words   |  4 PagesAdventures of Huckleberry Finn be required in school? Mark Twain’s â€Å"The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn† is said to be one of the greatest American novels to ever be written and is what all other pieces of American literature are based off of. The novel has been debated for over an entire century and will continue to be debated for much longer. Never the less, Huckleberry Finn teaches young students and adults the important life lessons. †The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn† by Mark Twain should remainRead MoreMark Twain s The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn1752 Words   |  8 Pagesinto New England which were pro-slavery in the 1850s (Ingraham). In Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn the setting is somewhere around 1840 in the areas surrounding the Mississippi River, and there were different standards back then regarding race. Twain has his characters fit the mold of how someone back then would talk and how they would act, and racism is a part of that. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Fin n, Mark Twain uses realistic elements such as regionalist dialect and the characters’Read MoreThemes in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn which Transcend Boundaries of Time and Culture1291 Words   |  6 PagesMark Twain’s novel, â€Å"The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), commonly known as Huckleberry Finn or Huck Finn, colorfully depicts people and places along the great Mississippi River. the novel contains a collection of themes which transcend time and cultural boundaries. It tells of a poor white buy running from a brutal parent, and an African-American man attempting to escape and free his himself from slavery. The main character, Huckleberry Finn, spends much time in the novel floating down theRead MoreEssay about The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Should NOT Be Banned2973 Words   |  12 Pagesbooks around the world have been banned because they are offensive. One example is Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, a novel about the journey of a thirteen-year-old boy named Huck, who fabricates his own death to run away with an escaped slave named Jim. The two voyage in a raft along the Mississippi River to gain their individual freedom. In addition, Huck gains a new understanding about humanity. Huck Finn has been creating great controversy on both sides of the argument: to ban or to

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Financial Accounting Point Regarding Financial Crisis

Question: Describe about the Financial Accounting for Point Regarding Financial Crisis. Answer: Ethical Dilemma The ethical dilemma analyzed in the case study is that company has faced some volatility because of some current financial crisis and in the first meeting the agenda do not contain any point regarding that financial crisis (Ferrell Fraedrich,2015). Being a member of the Audit Committee, it is his responsibility; there should be proper disclosure of risk of a factor in the financial statement of the company. Being a member of the audit committee of the company, he also analyzed that in the future company can also have some promising debts. In addition to it, it also does not have scheduled quarterly compliance audit on the portfolio loan, which is very much necessary for the lenders as a performance reporting. Then further moving on to the case study, the matter has been reported and been asked for the explanation to the chairman of the audit committee for not including the issue in the report (Zadek et al., 2013). But the chairman of the committee says that the matters have been already discussed with the CEO, and he has advised for not raising the matter of the financial crises in the meeting which is to be held and not to disclose the matter to any other, specially to the lenders of the committee. Further to that CEO has also said that the company will not be signing the compliance of the loan audit. It is so, as the audit is at the request of debt provider and not the committee. Still, after getting explanations, the person from the audit committee is concerned that the providers of the debt will be assuming the lo an compliance are being taken into considerations by the audit committee. Then the statement is prepared according to that because it is known that the leaders of the company are dependent on the favorability of the audit compliance (Doherty Purtilo,2015). Major ethical dilemma involved in the Case study is, not the inclusion of the loan compliance by the audit committee. Audit committee is the one, on whom every is relying for the correct disclosure of the facts and figure of the company. The Audit people is very much responsible for the proper disclosure of the financial statement so they should properly analyze all the aspects and facts of the financial reporting and present the report true to the fact. Disclosure of the financial statement should be done truly because it is the only method for an investor for analyzing a company for investing. The inclusion of the debt portfolio and loan in the company will be depicting limitation in company's position, which may tell the lenders and the investor to the withdrawal of the investment from the company. The company having a large number of debts and loans depicts that company cannot give much return to the investors of the company shortly (Kuntz et al., 2013). The CEO is advising not t o show the loan and debt portfolio by the auditing committee so that the investor can remain in the business for the longer period. But the ethical point should also be considered in disclosing the statements. Due to the ethical dilemma in the organization, many other issues may arise. The ethical dilemma will also create many conflicting problems in the mind of the members of the company. The ethical dilemma creates conflicts in the mind of the people working in the organization. Ethical dilemma ignores the fact of the morality. Ethical points dilemma creates a point of value and morality in the organization. Ethical dilemma stops a member of the company in fulfilling his or her responsibilities and duties true to the fact with all the presence of all the morality in the act. Reference list Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. (2015).Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Zadek, S., Evans, R., Pruzan, P. (2013).Building corporate accountability: Emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Routledge. Doherty, R. F., Purtilo, R. B. (2015).Ethical dimensions in the health professions. Elsevier Health Sciences. Kuntz, J. R. C., Kuntz, J. R., Elenkov, D., Nabirukhina, A. (2013). Characterizing ethical cases: A cross-cultural investigation of individual differences, organisational climate, and leadership on ethical decision-making.Journal of Business Ethics,113(2), 317-331.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Example Essay Example

Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Example Paper Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Introduction One of Luke’s main interests in Jesus was his preaching on the Kingdom of God. As Luke was arguably a gentile, he wanted to prove to all people that the Kingdom was present and that everyone is welcome to become a member. However what Luke wrote about the kingdom in some areas did contradict the Jews expectations. For example, Jewish understanding of the kingdom was that a divine rule would be the counterpart of the earthly kingship. This goes back to Old Testament when the prophet Samuel first anointed the first Jewish King Saul, as so was King David. The anointing of a king meant that they would represent God’s rule and would be regarded as God-sent.Jewish understanding of the kingdom increased significantly after Israel lost her independence in C6 BCE. Concepts of King and Messiah emerged during the inter-testamental era. The heavenly hosts of angels would defeat the devil and his armies and heaven would literally be created on earth. Essenes took particular interest in this belief as they searched for liberation and the coming of the kingdom of God. Another concept consists of no war. However gentiles would realise that there is no other saviour than Israel’s God, and would thus worship ‘God’ and acquiesce to the Jews.Jesus’ concept however of the Kingdom differed to that of the Jews as to them, the Kingdom of God would be much more earthly. As in Mark 1:15, ‘the Kingdom of God has arrived’. Jesus thus believed the kingdom to be a present reality in himself and his ministry ‘the kingdom of God is within you’ (Luke 17:21). However there have been three suggestions about the real meaning of eschatology. Futurist eschatology embrace Jesus’ teachings as a meaning that God’s kingdom will come in a tangible form at a time that is still in the future. This can be rectified as the ‘parousia’. According to Albert Schweitzer, who first popularised this idea meant however, th at Jesus held the same expectations as many Jewish apocalyptic writers of his day. He suggested that Jesus believed God would intervene immediately in the affairs of humanity and that his own life’s work would be the divisive climax that would come within Jesus’ lifetime.However C.H. Dodd contradicted Schweitzer’s theory on ‘futurist eschatology’and introduced his theory on ‘realised eschatology’. According to Dodd what Jesus was really saying was that the new society had arrived in his own person through his teachings thus Jesus’ teaching is ‘inaugural eschatology’. The coming of Jesus is thus the coming of God’s eternal reign.Miracles are much easier to understand if they are regarded as signs that God was creating a new society right there and then. To put these miracles into context, according to 1st century Jewish thinking, if one was ill, it was either due to their parents sins, or their own. However whe n Jesus healed the sick, for example the lame man, Jesus himself said, ‘friend your sins are forgiven.pick up your mat and walk’. This healing shows scholars today that to heal a person, was to forgive them, thus bring them back to God.Parables that appear to be concerned with the last days, such as the 10 bridesmaids or the rich fool, may not be a clear explanation of the final days however the challenge that all people when they are confronted with the message about Jesus and God’s new society. Dodd argues that the parable of the Great banquet does not in fact suggest that those who didn’t turn up to the banquet would not get a place in heaven however he states that those who didn’t turn up to the banquet, in fact turned up late and thus be given a second chance. This does seem to agree with his theory on realised eschatology, in that the kingdom is present and that everyone is given another opportunity.A third theory of eschatology is called â₠¬Ëœinaugurated eschatology’. This recognises that God’s new society did actually come in Jesus however the complete fulfilment was still seen in the future. This theory takes the best of both futurist and realised eschatology. This view recognises that God’s new society came in Jesus hence his teaching is ‘inaugurated’. This theory also recognises Schweitzer’s theory on futurist eschatology as it considers Jesus’ background as a first century Jew thus his teaching includes future events such as the downfall of the Temple, and the resurrection as part of the consummation of God’s society.What did Jesus mean about the Kingdom of God? The kingdom is defined as the ‘state or territory ruled by a king. In this case, as Luke suggests, God was going to set up a new state and rule it himself, however rather than being a material state, such as Israel, as it was in the Old Testament, it would be spiritual state for all mankind.When Jesus spoke about the Kingdom he mentioned in the Lords prayer ‘Father.Thy kingdom come’. Jesus uses the word Abba as if talking to an earthly father. This becomes much more personal and develops a much more loving relationship in comparison to that of the Old Testament, where all Jews feared a ‘jealous’ God. The word Abba indicates the uniqueness of the relationship between Jesus and his Father.Jesus saw the Kingdom of God as a New Israel, just as all first century Jews of his believed. Jesus taught that God’s rule requires realm in which to work. He speaks of men entering or being ‘cast out’ of the kingdom. Parables such as the mustard seed with its reference to birds nestling in its branches shows that Jesus has the gathering of a whole society in mind, or it could be described that if anyone has a small amount of faith, it will grow and influence others, just as the disciples preached and converted many to Christianity and those who died in Jesus’ name also influence others and strengthened their faith. Jesus also speaks of himself as a shepherd gathering his flock. In order to put his beliefs into practice however, Jesus had to ordain others to carry the Kerygma far and wide after his death and resurrection as prophesied in Luke 24:47-48, ‘.repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations.you are witnesses of these things.I am going to send you what God has promised’.Jesus called the twelve disciples, in parallel to the twelve tribes of Israel. This symbolic meaning could be translated into the fact that Jesus wanted his Holy word to be spread round the whole world beginning in Jerusalem, as mentioned in Luke 24:26. This would be beginning of the creation of the New Israel. The disciples were sent out to proclaim the Kingdom (Luke9:1-2) ‘He gave them power to drive out all demons and to cure diseases.sent them out to preach the kingdom of God’.In the Last Supper, Jesus himself shared the New Covenant; ‘I will not eat and drink from this cup until it finds fulfilment of in the kingdom of God.’ The significance of the Last Supper in context of the kingdom, is that in the Old Testament Moses made a covenant with God using bull’s blood, however it was not eternal as it had been broken several times by the Israelites, however Jesus died on the cross to bridge an ‘eternal’ relationship with God, for all people.In Luke’s gospel, the kingdom is centred in Christ, (Luke 18:29) ‘for the sake of the kingdom of God’. Mark writes, ‘the Kingdom of God came with power’. The gospel writers all assumed the same meaning between the kingdom of God and Christ. Jews believed that the ‘Christ’ would rather lead an earthly kingdom following the Torah laws, however they didn’t expect a heavenly spiritual Christ. What Jesus says, was originally taken from Daniel 7: ‘.Son of Man.and he was given dominion and a kingdom that all peoples and nations would serve him.the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever.’This means that God gives the kingdom to the Son of Man and the Saints of the Most High will also receive it. This could explain why in Luke’s gospel, Jesus promises the kingdom to those who believe in His name (Luke 9:24) ‘for whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it.’ However in order to fulfil his destiny Jesus had to suffer, die and rise again on the third day, therefore fulfilling the scriptures and Isaiah’s suffering servant prayer.Jews believed that in order to inherit the Kingdom of heaven you had to be a Jew and follow the law, which God gave to them. However in Luke’s gospel, Jesus tells his disciples and followers, to ‘carry his cross and follow him’. In order to inherit the kingd om, just as Jesus suffered and died for our sins, to be a disciple, you must not carry material possessions but put others before yourself. Jewish teaching on an ‘eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ had now changed to forgiving others and ‘treat others as yourself’.The consummation of the kingdom however is still yet to come. Despite Jesus’ prophecies that he will die and rise on the third day, Jesus also prophesied of a ‘second coming’ as mentioned earlier, the ‘parousia’. Mark 13:26, ‘and they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds.before him will be gathered all the nations and he will separate them from one another as a shepherd separates the sheep from goats.’ Schweitzer believed that Jesus’ death was in vain and did not fulfil its purpose, however Dodd has argued that Jesus fulfilled Old Testament scriptures and is still yet to complete the coming of Judgement day. It has been argued that the fire of Rome was arguably the beginning of the end as all Christians were persecuted, (Luke21:12) ‘.but before all this they must first lay hands on you and persecute you’. The destruction of the Temple was also predicted, thus many people perceived the end of days were near. In Paul’s writings, he writes with a sense of urgency and says ‘do not marry, or sin for the end of days are near, be ready!’ However many Christians today believe that the end of days are still to come, which both Jews and Christians alike await.In conclusion, Jewish understanding of the Kingdom of God slightly differs to that of Jesus’ teachings. Jews expected an earthly king to come and liberate them from the occupation of the Romans, as Jesus entered Jerusalem, they expected him to ride on a horse with armament as a ‘fighting’ leader, on the contrary Jesus was humble and instead rode on a donkey. In Luke’s gospel as well as the other gospel writers , the Kingdom is portrayed as a spiritual kingdom for all people united as one. Jewish leaders of the day took this teaching as an insult to the Jewish nation as they had been waiting centuries to be set free and yet they didn’t get their earthly response. However one agreement between Christians and Jews alike, is that they still await the Judgement Day in earnest and the coming of Christ in order to consummate the kingdom. Show how Luke’s presentation differs from Jewish expectations Essay Thank you for reading this Sample!